Data Structures You Probably Ignore (But Shouldn’t)

In partnership with

When developers talk about data structures, the conversation usually starts and ends with arrays, linked lists, hash maps, and maybe a binary tree or two. These are the bread and butter of most programming tutorials, interview prep guides, and coding bootcamps.

But here’s the thing: the world of data structures is far richer, and some of the most useful ones don’t get the spotlight they deserve. In practice, knowing when and how to use less common data structures can give you a huge edge. They often solve real-world problems more elegantly than hammering everything into a hashmap-shaped solution.

In this issue of Nullpointer Club, let’s explore some data structures you probably overlook — but shouldn’t.

1. Tries (Prefix Trees)

A trie is a tree-like data structure where each node represents a character in a string. You rarely see it in basic tutorials, yet it’s a powerhouse for tasks involving search and autocomplete.

• Why it matters: Instead of checking every string in a list to see if it matches a prefix, a trie lets you traverse character by character, making operations like prefix search lightning fast.

• Where it shines: Autocomplete systems, spell checkers, IP routing tables.

• Pro tip: In modern programming languages, tries can often be memory-heavy. Use them when fast prefix queries matter more than space.

2. Bloom Filters

A Bloom filter is a probabilistic data structure used to test whether an element is in a set. It can return “possibly in the set” or “definitely not in the set.”

• Why it matters: It’s blazingly fast and memory-efficient, especially for huge datasets.

• Where it shines: Database caching (to check if an item might be in a cache before querying), detecting spammy URLs, or avoiding unnecessary lookups in large systems.

• Pro tip: Accept the trade-off. Bloom filters are not 100% accurate (false positives happen), but they’re extremely efficient for large-scale systems where speed and space matter more than precision.

3. Skip Lists

Think of skip lists as “linked lists on steroids.” They use multiple layers of linked lists with shortcuts that let you skip ahead. This creates an ordered data structure that supports fast search, insertion, and deletion — often rivaling balanced trees.

• Why it matters: They’re simpler to implement than red-black trees or AVL trees but still give you logarithmic time complexity.

• Where it shines: Databases and distributed systems. Fun fact: Apache Cassandra and Redis use skip lists under the hood.

• Pro tip: If you’re intimidated by tree rotations and balancing logic, skip lists are an elegant alternative to balanced search trees.

4. Disjoint Set (Union-Find)

The disjoint set (or union-find) data structure helps track a collection of non-overlapping sets and supports two key operations: finding which set an element belongs to, and merging two sets.

• Why it matters: With path compression and union by rank, it runs in nearly constant time.

• Where it shines: Network connectivity problems, Kruskal’s algorithm for minimum spanning trees, social network friend groups, and clustering.

• Pro tip: You’ll encounter it in competitive programming and graph theory problems. It’s one of those hidden gems that makes you look like a wizard in algorithm interviews.

5. Fenwick Tree (Binary Indexed Tree)

This one rarely appears in beginner-friendly guides, but it’s a game changer for range queries. A Fenwick tree efficiently supports prefix sum queries and updates in logarithmic time.

• Why it matters: Imagine recalculating sums for dynamic arrays repeatedly—it’s inefficient. A Fenwick tree fixes that.

• Where it shines: Competitive programming, financial apps (like calculating cumulative gains/losses), and systems where data updates frequently.

• Pro tip: If you’ve ever struggled with segment trees, start with Fenwick trees. They’re easier to implement and solve 80% of the same problems.

Why These Data Structures Stay in the Shadows

There are two reasons many developers ignore these:

1. Tutorial bias: Most educational material focuses on “classic” structures.

2. Perceived complexity: Some sound intimidating but are simpler than you think once you try them.

But ignoring them means missing out on cleaner, more efficient solutions. Every time you solve a problem with brute force when a specialized structure exists, you’re leaving performance — and learning — on the table.

Stoic Takeaway for Developers

The Stoics taught that real power comes not from abundance but from mastery of essentials. In software, that doesn’t just mean knowing arrays and hashmaps. It means cultivating the awareness to choose the right tool, even when it’s not the most familiar.

A trie, a skip list, or a Bloom filter may not appear in your daily stand-up, but when the right problem shows up, these “ignored” data structures become superpowers.

Closing Thought

Great developers don’t just write code that works. They write code that scales, adapts, and endures. Expanding your data structure toolkit is a small but profound step in that direction.

So the next time you’re tempted to throw another hashmap at the problem, pause. Ask yourself: is there a quieter, less popular structure that fits better? Chances are, there is — and using it could be the difference between average code and elegant engineering.

Until next drop,

— Nullpointer Club