Rate Limiting 101: Keep Your APIs Alive When Traffic Spikes

In partnership with

High traffic is a good problem — until your API collapses under pressure.

Whether you’re building public APIs, scaling SaaS apps, or handling internal microservices, rate limiting and API throttling are essential to protect your infrastructure, maintain performance, and keep users happy.

In this issue of Nullpointer Club, we’ll break down what rate limiting and throttling actually mean, how they differ, popular algorithms, and real-world strategies to help you scale without outages or abuse.

Why You Need Rate Limiting

APIs don’t have infinite bandwidth. Without limits:

• A single client can exhaust server resources

• Bots can hammer endpoints and cause cascading failures

• Spikes can slow down or crash services for everyone

Rate limiting solves this by controlling how many requests a client (user, IP, token, etc.) can make in a given timeframe.

It ensures:

• Fair usage across users

• Protection from abuse or brute force attacks

• Stability during traffic surges or DDoS scenarios

Rate Limiting vs. Throttling — What’s the Difference?

Though often used interchangeably, there’s a subtle difference:

Example:
If you allow 100 requests per minute:

• Rate limiting may reject request #101 outright

• Throttling may delay it and process it when the next slot opens

Both are forms of traffic control — use them based on system sensitivity and user experience needs.

Popular Rate Limiting Algorithms

Different algorithms suit different use cases. Here are the top contenders:

1. Fixed Window

• Simple logic: count requests in each time window (e.g., 60 seconds)

• Risk: Spikes at window boundaries (e.g., 100 requests at 00:59 and 100 at 01:00)

2. Sliding Window

• Uses rolling timeframes to smooth out request distribution

• Requires more memory (storing timestamps), but reduces burstiness

3. Token Bucket

• Tokens are added at a fixed rate; each request uses one token

• Allows short bursts, but sustains a steady overall rate

4. Leaky Bucket

• Like a queue with a fixed drain rate

• Smoothens traffic by processing requests at a consistent pace

Pro tip: Use token bucket for user-facing APIs (allows bursts), and leaky bucket for internal services (ensures smooth flow).

Real-World Implementation Tips

1. Choose the Right Key

Decide what you're limiting on:

• IP address – simple but can block entire organizations

• User ID or API key – better for public APIs

• Route-level limits – useful for sensitive endpoints like /login or /checkout

2. Use a Fast Store (Not a DB)

Rate limiting must be low-latency and scalable. Use:

• Redis – most common for token/leaky bucket counters

• In-memory stores – for single-node apps

• Avoid relational DBs — too slow for real-time checks

3. Return Clear HTTP Headers

Inform clients of their limits:

http
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 12
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1688875260

This improves developer experience and avoids unnecessary retries.

4. Plan for Burst Traffic

Allow short bursts without hurting your system.

• Set soft and hard limits (e.g., 10 rps soft, 20 rps hard)

• Use throttling to slow down, not break, high-volume clients

API Gateways & Tools That Make It Easier

If you don’t want to build your own rate limiter, modern tools and gateways come with it baked in:

• NGINX / Kong Gateway – Rate limiting plugins

• AWS API Gateway – Per-client and per-method throttling

• Cloudflare – Layer 7 rate limits with bot protection

• Envoy Proxy – Great for microservices

• Istio / Linkerd – Service mesh-level traffic control

Handling Violations Gracefully

When a user exceeds their limit:

• Return a 429 Too Many Requests HTTP status

• Include headers showing when they can retry

• Offer premium tiers for higher limits (monetize traffic)

• For public APIs, consider CAPTCHA or proof-of-work challenges

Final Thought

Rate limiting isn’t just about protecting your backend — it’s about designing a fair, stable, and scalable experience for your users.

When done right, it prevents abuse, maintains uptime, and encourages responsible usage — all while giving your systems room to breathe.

Because at the end of the day, surviving a traffic surge gracefully is a sign that your app is built to last — not just to launch.

Fresh Breakthroughs and Bold Moves in Tech & AI

Stay ahead with curated updates on innovations, disruptions, and game-changing developments shaping the future of technology and artificial intelligence.

Top 5 Takeaways from Meta’s Response to the EU DMA Ruling. Link

• Meta outright rejects the DMA ruling
  Meta has slammed the EU decision as “incorrect and unlawful,” arguing it contradicts a prior European Court of Justice judgment that supported offering ad-funded or subscription-based choices

• What’s at stake is big — and costly
  The April ruling imposed a €200 million fine on Meta. The EU is now warning of daily penalties of up to 5% of global turnover, starting as early as June 27, if Meta doesn’t comply

• Meta defends its model as fair and transparent
  According to Meta, it already offers “legitimate choice” by enabling users to pick between personalized ads or paying for an ad-free experience. It accuses the EU .

• The decision may hurt users and advertisers
  Meta warns that enforcing a less personalized, free ads option could degrade ad relevance. This risks frustrating users (with repetitive or irrelevant ads) and harming small and medium-sized businesses dependent on effective targeting

• Meta is taking legal action — and pushing back publicly
  Meta has launched an appeal, claiming the ruling hampers innovation, ignores commercial realities, and disrupts meaningful regulatory dialogue — despite ongoing engagement efforts

Until next time,
 – The Nullpointer Club Team