- Null Pointer Club
- Posts
- The Evolution of APIs: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and Beyond
The Evolution of APIs: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and Beyond
From resource URIs to real-time data streaming — how API design keeps getting smarter.
APIs are the unsung heroes of modern software.
They power your apps, your payments, your chatbots, and even your smartwatch’s heartbeat monitor.
But like every layer in the tech stack, APIs evolve. What worked in 2012 may feel sluggish or over-engineered today. So this week, we’re tracing the path from REST to GraphQL to gRPC and beyond — and what that means for the future of web services.
Let’s unpack how we got here—and where we’re going.
You Don’t Need to Be Technical. Just Informed
AI isn’t optional anymore—but coding isn’t required.
The AI Report gives business leaders the edge with daily insights, use cases, and implementation guides across ops, sales, and strategy.
Trusted by professionals at Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft.
👉 Get the newsletter and make smarter AI decisions.
Phase 1: REST — The Gold Standard (For a While)
Born: Early 2000s
Style: Resource-based HTTP interfaces
Familiar friends: GET /users
, POST /orders
REST was simple. Predictable. It used standard HTTP methods, status codes, and URIs. JSON became the de facto format. Devs loved its clarity.
Pros:
Human-readable and easy to debug
Stateless architecture = scalable
Huge ecosystem, great caching
Cons:
Overfetching or underfetching data
Multiple endpoints to get related data
Rigid versioning can slow iteration
Use it when:
You're building straightforward CRUD apps or public APIs with stable contracts.
Phase 2: GraphQL — The Client Controls the Data
Born: 2015 (by Facebook)
Style: Query language for APIs
Familiar friends: query { user { name, posts { title } } }
GraphQL flipped the model: Instead of the server dictating what you get, the client requests exactly what it needs. One endpoint. Nested queries. Flexible data access.
Pros:
No overfetching or underfetching
Powerful introspection and type safety
Real-time subscriptions possible
Cons:
Performance can degrade with complex queries
Caching is harder than REST
Steeper learning curve on large teams
Use it when:
You’re building dynamic UIs (like dashboards or mobile apps) where flexibility and performance matter.
Phase 3: gRPC — The High-Performance Protocol
Born: 2015 (by Google)
Style: Remote Procedure Call (RPC) with Protocol Buffers
Familiar friends: service UserService { rpc GetUser(UserRequest) returns (User) }
gRPC is made for machine-to-machine communication. It’s compact, fast, and strongly typed. It’s used everywhere from microservices to cloud-native apps.
Pros:
Blazing fast binary format
Streaming support
Excellent for internal service meshes
Cons:
Not human-readable
Debugging and monitoring are harder
Needs protobuf compilation
Use it when:
You need performance and control—especially for backend-to-backend communication or high-volume APIs.
Phase 4: Beyond the Big Three — What’s Next?
Here’s what’s rising in the post-REST world:
WebSockets & Server-Sent Events
For real-time, event-driven APIs like chat apps, games, or trading platforms. These protocols offer low-latency updates pushed from the server.
Example:
A GraphQL subscription over WebSocket streams stock prices in real time.
Async APIs (AsyncAPI Spec)
Ideal for event-driven architectures like Kafka, MQTT, or message queues. The AsyncAPI Initiative helps standardize how these APIs are documented and shared.
AI-Native APIs
Emerging API patterns now focus on integrating with LLMs, vector databases, or hybrid tools like LangChain and Semantic Kernel. These APIs often prioritize context, chunked responses, and long-running tasks.
API Gateways & Meshes
APIs now live inside complex systems. Tools like Envoy, Istio, and Kong help route, transform, and secure API calls across services.
Side-by-Side Cheat Sheet
API Type | Best For | Format | Speed | Tooling Maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|
REST | CRUD apps, public APIs | JSON over HTTP | 🟡 Medium | 🟢 High |
GraphQL | Dynamic UIs, mobile/web apps | JSON | 🟠 Medium | 🟢 High |
gRPC | Microservices, internal APIs | Protobuf | 🟢 Very High | 🟡 Medium |
WebSocket | Real-time updates, streams | JSON/binary | 🟢 High | 🟠 Low |
AsyncAPI | Event-based systems | Varies | 🟠 Varies | 🟠 Growing |
Future Trends to Watch
API-as-Product: Dev-first companies now treat APIs as their core product (Twilio, Stripe, OpenAI). That means better docs, SDKs, usage analytics, and monetization layers.
Composable APIs: Tools like tRPC, BFFs (Backend for Frontend), and Edge APIs let teams stitch together micro-interfaces tailored for different clients.
Zero-code/Low-code APIs: Platforms like Retool, Zapier, and Pipedream are making APIs easier to integrate—even for non-devs.
Secure-by-default APIs: OAuth 2.1, JWT best practices, rate-limiting, and zero-trust models are now must-haves.
TL;DR
APIs are no longer just glue between services.
They are the product. Or at the very least, the nervous system of your app.
So whether you're building your first REST API or debugging a flaky GraphQL subscription, remember this:
The best API isn’t just fast or flexible—it’s understandable, observable, and evolvable.
Fresh Breakthroughs and Bold Moves in Tech & AI
Stay ahead with curated updates on innovations, disruptions, and game-changing developments shaping the future of technology and artificial intelligence.
Google Debuts “Sans Code” Font: A Historic Take on Readability for Developers link
Every Character Counts
Google’s new Google Sans Code is a custom monospaced font optimized for programming—designed with widened internal spaces and distinct glyph shapes to eliminate confusion between similar characters like ‘0’ vs. ‘O’ and ‘1’ vs. ‘l’Drawing on Typographic Tradition
The italic style isn't a mere slanted version; it’s inspired by a 16th‑century Italian scribe’s handwriting—meant to separate comment text visually from code while echoing a timeless annotation styleCode-First Clarity
Built on the Google Sans visual identity, this font ensures clarity even at small editor sizes—especially important for developers who spend hours scanning dense textDeveloper-Centric Features
Includes support for box‑drawing and other symbols used in terminals and code editors, comes in variable weights (300–800), and supports extended Latin characters under an open licenseA Blend of Tech and History
Sans Code bridges Google’s modern brand design aesthetic with centuries-old typographic practice—melding style, function, and readability in a dev‑friendly package
Until next week,
— Team Nullpointer
Reply